subject
Business, 04.10.2019 21:10 robert7248

Amining company is considering a new project. because the mine has received a permit, the project would be legal; but it would cause significant harm to a nearby river. the firm could spend an additional $10 million at year 0 to mitigate the environmental problem, but it would not be required to do so. developing the mine (without mitigation) would cost $60 million, and expected net cash inflows would be $20 million per year for 5 years. if the firm does invest in mitigation, the annual inflows would be $21 million. the risk-adjusted wacc is 12%.a) calculate the npv and irr with and without mitigation. b) how should the environmental effects be dealt with when this project is evaluated? c) should this project be undertaken? if so, should the firm do the mitigation?

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Business

question
Business, 21.06.2019 18:20
The sticky-price theory asserts that the output prices of some goods and services adjust slowly to changes in the price level. suppose firms announce the prices for their products in advance, based on an expected price level of 100 for the coming year. many of the firms sell their goods through catalogs and face high costs of reprinting if they change prices. the actual price level turns out to be 110. faced with high menu costs, the firms that rely on catalog sales choose not to adjust their prices. sales from catalogs will
Answers: 3
question
Business, 22.06.2019 07:50
The questions of economics address which of the following ? check all that apply
Answers: 3
question
Business, 22.06.2019 09:20
Which statement best explains the relationship between points a and b? a. consumption reaches its highest point, and then supply begins to fall. b. inflation reaches its highest point, and then the economy begins to expand. c. production reaches its highest point, and then the economy begins to contract. d. unemployment reaches its highest point, and then inflation begins to decrease.
Answers: 2
question
Business, 22.06.2019 14:40
Nell and kirby are in the process of negotiating their divorce agreement. what should be the tax consequences to nell and kirby if the following, considered individually, became part of the agreement? a. in consideration for her one-half interest in their personal residence, kirby will transfer to nell stock with a value of $200,000 and $50,000 of cash. kirby's cost of the stock was $150,000, and the value of the personal residence is $500,000. they purchased the residence three years ago for $300,000.nell's basis for the stock is $ xkirby's basis in the house is $ xb. nell will receive $1,000 per month for 120 months. if she dies before receiving all 120 payments, the remaining payments will be made to her estate.the payments (qualify, do not qualify) as alimony and are (included in, excluded from) nell's gross income as they are received.c. nell is to have custody of their 12-year-old son, bobby. she is to receive $1,200 per month until bobby (1) dies or (2) attains age 21 (whichever occurs first). after either of these events occurs, nell will receive only $300 per month for the remainder of her life.$ x per month is alimony that is (included in, excluded from) nell's gross income, and the remaining $ x per month is considered (child support, property settlement) and is (nontaxable, taxable) to nell.
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Amining company is considering a new project. because the mine has received a permit, the project wo...
Questions
question
Social Studies, 04.07.2019 04:30
Questions on the website: 13722363