An insurance company is
a. not a financial intermediary because they do not take direct deposits and do not make loans.
b. a financial intermediary because they take premiums and use them to purchase financial securities.
c. not a financial intermediary because financial intermediaries act as a go-between for borrowers and lenders.
d. a financial intermediary because they take deposits and make mortgages and car loans.

Ineed : ): will mark brainliest! describe sinek's golden circle. what does he use this for? sinek argues that "people don't buy 'what' you do; people buy 'why' you do it." what does he mean by this? do you agree or disagree with him? why? what are the advantages of hiring people who share the same beliefs and visions in terms of the company's 'why' or purpose? why wasn't tivo successful as a company? what is the difference between leaders and those who lead? how does safety contribute to trust and cooperation? what are some ways that leaders can make the company environment safe? what are the advantages of companies where employees feel safe and protected?

1. the political environment in india has proven to be critical to company performance for both pepsico and coca-cola india. what specific aspects of the political environment have played key roles? could these effects have been anticipated prior to market entry? if not, could developments in the political arena have been handled better by each company? 2. timing of entry into the indian market brought different results for pepsico and coca-cola india. what benefits or disadvantages accrued as a result of earlier or later market entry? 3. the indian market is enormous in terms of population and geography. how have the two companies responded to the sheer scale of operations in india in terms of product policies, promotional activities, pricing policies, and distribution arrangements? 4. “global localization” (glocalization) is a policy that both companies have implemented successfully. give examples for each company from the case.

Penny poodle wanted to know which dog obedience training program was more effective: puppy pride, the approach she has been using for any years, or doggie do-right, a new approach. penny convinced 50 human companions of untrained dogs to participate in her study. the dogs and their humans were randomly assigned to complete the puppy pride or doggie do-right course. at the end of the training programs, all of the dogs were scored on their level of obedience on a standardized dog obedience checklist (scores could range from 10 to 100). the design of this study is: