Sklar, cpa, purchased from wiz corp. two computers. sklar discovered material defects in the computers 10 months after taking delivery. three years after discovering the defects, sklar commenced an action for breach of warranty against wiz. wiz has raised the statute of limitations as a defense. the original contract between wiz and sklar contained a conspicuous clause providing that the statute of limitations for breach of warranty actions would be limited to 18 months. under the circumstances, sklar will

End up losing because it is legally binding the clause that would limit the statute of limitations to 18 months.

Explanation:

Within UCC 2-725, in cases that involve the exchange of goods, a 4-year restriction law applies. The parties can reduce the duration to not less than 1 year (but not extend it).

When a delivery tender is made, an action for violation of warranty accrues (the statute begins to run).

However if the warranty specifically applies to future performance and violation disclosure must postpone that performance, the penalty will occur when the breach is discovered or should have been discovered.

answer; (1) blank; decreases; ///blank(2) increases; ///blank(3)increases;