At the beginning of the current period, splish brothers inc. had balances in accounts receivable of $202,700 and in allowance for doubtful accounts of $9,200. during the period, it had net credit sales of $744,100 and collections of $829,950. it wrote off as uncollectible accounts receivable of $7,798. uncollectible accounts are estimated to total $26,820 at the end of the period. (omit recording cost of goods sold.) (a - c) enter the beginning balances for accounts receivable and allowance for doubtful accounts in a tabular summary. use the summary to record transactions (a), (b), and (c) below. (a) record sales and collections during the period. (b) record the write-off of uncollectible accounts during the period. (c) record bad debt expense for the period.

Cooper sues company a in state court in south carolina, where he lives, for negligence alleging personal injury and property damage of $100,000 after a truck driven by an employee of company a rear-ended his pickup truck. company a is incorporated in delaware, has its headquarters in new york, but does a substantial amount of business in south carolina. claiming diversity of citizenship, company a seeks removal to federal district court, but cooper opposes the motion. which of the following is true regarding whether the case may be properly removed to federal district court? the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and if company a's nerve center is in a state other than south carolina, then the case may be properly removed to federal court.the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and because company a is incorporated and has its headquarters in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is incorporated in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a's headquarters, nerve center, or principal place of business is located.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is headquartered in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a is incorporated and regardless of the location of its nerve center.because the amount in controversy fails to satisfy jurisdictional requirements, regardless of the location of company a, the case may not be removed to federal court.