Tune products, inc., offers to sell to unlimited sales company one hundred mp3 players at $50 a piece, subject to certain specific delivery dates. unlimited replies with a signed purchase order that reads, "accept your offer for 100 i-appliances at $50 each. must be delivered to our warehouse." tune does not respond or deliver the goods. unlimited files a suit for breach of contract, to which tune answers that there is no contract because unlimited's purchase order contained additional terms and is not signed by tune. can unlimited recover? analyze with the irac method below: identify the issue(s) for the court to decide? what legal rule(s) should the court should apply? what is your analysis? (what are the arguments of each side, which facts support those arguments? what do you find most persuasive? provide your conclusion: response to issue(s) identified (yes or no to each issue) and brief explanation of why.

The movement of an economy from one condition to another and back again

Alandowner entered into a written agreement with a real estate broker whereby the broker would receive a commission of 10% of the sale price if he procured a "ready, willing, and able buyer" for the landowner's property and if the sale actually proceeded through closing. the broker found a buyer who agreed in writing to buy the property from the landowner for $100,000, the landowner's asking price. the buyer put up $6,000 as a down payment. the agreement between the landowner and the buyer contained a liquidated damages clause providing that, if the buyer defaulted by failing to tender the balance due of $94,000 at the closing date, damages would be 10% of the purchase price. the landowner included that clause because she was counting on using the proceeds of the sale for a business venture that would likely net her at least $10,000. the buyer became seriously ill and defaulted. when he recovered, he demanded that the landowner return his $6,000, and the landowner refused. the broker also demanded the $6,000 from the landowner and was refused. the broker and the buyer filed separate suits against the landowner, with the buyer pleading impossibility of performance. the two cases are consolidated into a single case. how should the court rule as to the disposition of the $6,000?

Carmen co. can further process product j to produce product d. product j is currently selling for $20 per pound and costs $15.75 per pound to produce. product d would sell for $38 per pound and would require an additional cost of $8.55 per pound to produce. what is the differential revenue of producing product d?