Business, 30.11.2019 05:31 danielbamf1414

Suppose there are only two firms that sell smart phones, flashfone and pictech. the following payoff matrix shows the profit (in millions of dollars) each company will earn, depending on whether it sets a high or low price for its phones.

pictech pricing
high low
flashfone pricing high 11, 11 2, 15
low 15, 2 8, 8
for example, the lower, left cell shows that if flashfone prices low and pictech prices high, flashfone will earn a profit of $15 million and pictech will earn a profit of $2 million. assume this is a simultaneous game and that flashfone and pictech are both profit-maximizing firms.

if flashfone prices high, pictech will make more profit if it chooses a (high, low) price, and if flashfone prices low, pictech will make more profit if it chooses a(high, price.

if pictech prices high, flashfone will make more profit if it chooses a(high,, and if pictech prices low, flashfone will make more profit if it chooses a (high, low) price.

considering all of the information given, pricing high (is, is not) a dominant strategy for both flashfone and pictech. (note: a dominant strategy is a strategy that is best for a player regardless of the strategies chosen by the other players.)

if the firms do not collude, which strategy will they end up choosing?

flashfone will choose a low price and pictech will choose a high price.

flashfone will choose a high price and pictech will choose a low price.

both flashfone and pictech will choose a low price.

both flashfone and pictech will choose a high price.

true or false: the game between flashfone and pictech is an example of the prisoners' dilemma.

true

false

Answers: 2

Show answers

Another question on Business

Business, 21.06.2019 21:30

Price and efficiency variances, journal entries. the schuyler corporation manufactures lamps. it has set up the following standards per finished unit for direct materials and direct manufacturing labor: direct materials: 10 lb. at $4.50 per lb. $45.00 direct manufacturing labor: 0.5 hour at $30 per hour 15.00 the number of finished units budgeted for january 2017 was 10,000; 9,850 units were actually produced. actual results in january 2017 were as follows: direct materials: 98,055 lb. used direct manufacturing labor: 4,900 hours $154,350 assume that there was no beginning inventory of either direct materials or finished units. during the month, materials purchased amounted to 100,000 lb., at a total cost of $465,000. input price variances are isolated upon purchase. input-efficiency variances are isolated at the time of usage. 1. compute the january 2017 price and efficiency variances of direct materials and direct manufacturing labor. 2. prepare journal entries to record the variances in requirement 1. 3. comment on the january 2017 price and efficiency variances of schuyler corporation. 4. why might schuyler calculate direct materials price variances and direct materials efficiency variances with reference to different points in time

Answers: 2

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 06:30

"in my opinion, we ought to stop making our own drums and accept that outside supplier's offer," said wim niewindt, managing director of antilles refining, n.v., of aruba. "at a price of $21 per drum, we would be paying $4.70 less than it costs us to manufacture the drums in our own plant. since we use 70,000 drums a year, that would be an annual cost savings of $329,000." antilles refining's current cost to manufacture one drum is given below (based on 70,000 drums per year):

Answers: 1

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 14:40

Nell and kirby are in the process of negotiating their divorce agreement. what should be the tax consequences to nell and kirby if the following, considered individually, became part of the agreement? a. in consideration for her one-half interest in their personal residence, kirby will transfer to nell stock with a value of $200,000 and $50,000 of cash. kirby's cost of the stock was $150,000, and the value of the personal residence is $500,000. they purchased the residence three years ago for $300,000.nell's basis for the stock is $ xkirby's basis in the house is $ xb. nell will receive $1,000 per month for 120 months. if she dies before receiving all 120 payments, the remaining payments will be made to her estate.the payments (qualify, do not qualify) as alimony and are (included in, excluded from) nell's gross income as they are received.c. nell is to have custody of their 12-year-old son, bobby. she is to receive $1,200 per month until bobby (1) dies or (2) attains age 21 (whichever occurs first). after either of these events occurs, nell will receive only $300 per month for the remainder of her life.$ x per month is alimony that is (included in, excluded from) nell's gross income, and the remaining $ x per month is considered (child support, property settlement) and is (nontaxable, taxable) to nell.

Answers: 3

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 15:50

Evaluate a real situation between two economic actors; it could be any scenario: two competing businesses, two countries in negotiations, two kids trading baseball cards, you and another person involved in an exchange or anything else. use game theory to analyze the situation and the outcome (or potential outcome). be sure to explain the incentives, benefits and risks each face.

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

Suppose there are only two firms that sell smart phones, flashfone and pictech. the following payoff...

Questions