Protective tariffs might reduce both the imports and the exports of the nation that levies tariffs because other countries may follow with their own export tariffs. protective tariffs can be designed to either reduce imports or exports. other countries may follow with their own import tariffs. a. exports and imports must be equal. b. when foreign firms "dump" their products onto the u. s. market, they give their product away and bankrupt american firms. buy up all of that particular product and lower the price. buy up all of that particular product and raise the price. sell their product below cost and provide bargains to american consumers. c. import competition can lead to job gains worldwide. job losses worldwide. quality improvements and cost reductions by american firms. fewer high-quality products.

Becky fenton has 40/80/40 automobile insurance coverage. if two other people are awarded $75,000 each for injuries in an auto accident in which becky was judged at fault, how much of this judgment would the insurance cover?

Why might a business based on a fad be a good idea? question 2 options: fads bring in the most customers. some fads are longer lasting than expected. fads have made some business owners incredibly wealthy. fads can take a business in a new direction.

Cooper sues company a in state court in south carolina, where he lives, for negligence alleging personal injury and property damage of $100,000 after a truck driven by an employee of company a rear-ended his pickup truck. company a is incorporated in delaware, has its headquarters in new york, but does a substantial amount of business in south carolina. claiming diversity of citizenship, company a seeks removal to federal district court, but cooper opposes the motion. which of the following is true regarding whether the case may be properly removed to federal district court? the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and if company a's nerve center is in a state other than south carolina, then the case may be properly removed to federal court.the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and because company a is incorporated and has its headquarters in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is incorporated in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a's headquarters, nerve center, or principal place of business is located.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is headquartered in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a is incorporated and regardless of the location of its nerve center.because the amount in controversy fails to satisfy jurisdictional requirements, regardless of the location of company a, the case may not be removed to federal court.