Business, 21.12.2019 06:31 isabellabetanco

Apractitioner is engaged to prepare a client's federal income tax return for 2017 and 2018. the practitioner files the 2017 return on the client's behalf and provided copies of the 2017 return and all related documents to the client. after the 2018 return is prepared, the client disputes the fees for the 2018 tax engagement, terminates the relationship, and requests all tax returns and related records. the client has not yet paid for the preparation of the 2018 return.
under irs circular 230, which records must the practitioner return to the client?

a) notes the practitioner took when meeting with the client about the 2017 and 2018 tax returns.
b) the engagement letter executed by the client for the preparation of the 2018 federal income tax return.
c) an appraisal the practitioner prepared in connection with the 2017 federal income tax return.
d) schedules the practitioner prepared, which the client needs to file in its 2018 federal income tax return.

Answers: 3

Show answers

Another question on Business

Business, 21.06.2019 15:00

In order to be thoughtful about the implementation of security policies and controls, leaders must balance the need to with the impact to the business operations. doing so could mean phasing security controls in over time or be as simple as aligning security implementation with the business’s training events.

Answers: 1

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 15:10

Paddock pools constructed a swimming pool and deck for the jensens' home. paddock installed the wrong trim on the pool. it would cost $2800 to change the trim-one-fifth of the total cost of the pool. the jensens refuse to pay anything for the pool. the paddock's best defense is: (a) duress (b) substanial performance (c)mistake (d) failure of conditions

Answers: 3

Answer

Business, 23.06.2019 12:40

Intoxicated and not aware of the consequences, umberto agrees to a two-year cell-phone service contract with wander talk, inc., at more than the average market price. this contract is not enforceable because the contract clearly favors wander talk. not enforceable because umberto was intoxicated enough to lack mental capacity when he agreed to it. not enforceable because contracting parties can change their minds. enforceable.

Answers: 3

Answer

Business, 23.06.2019 20:30

Mike, the chief executive officer (ceo) of a retail chain, wanted to keep costs low. to set an example for others, he drove his own car and furnished his office with plain, metal desks. in this case, mike was displaying:

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

Apractitioner is engaged to prepare a client's federal income tax return for 2017 and 2018. the prac...

Questions