The saki motorcycle dealer in the minneapolis-st. paul area wants to make an accurate forecast of demand for the saki super txii motorcycle during the next month. because the manufacturer is in japan, it is difficult to send motorcycles back to reorder if the proper number is not ordered a month ahead. from sales records, the dealer has accumulated the following data for the past year: ) compute a 3-month moving average forecast of demand for april through january (of the next year).b) compute a 5-month moving average forecast for june through january. c) compare the two forecasts computed in (a) and (b), using mad. which one should the dealer use for january of the next year? i have completed (a) and (b), but i'm having trouble computing the mad values. the mad values (according to the back of the book) are mad(3) = 1.89 and mad(5) = 2.43. i'm not sure how to arrive at those answers? (a) 3-month moving averagesjan 0feb 0march 0april 8.67may 8.33june 8.33july 9.00aug 9.67sept 11.00oct 11.00nov 11.00dec 12.00jan 13.33(b) 5-month moving averagesjan 0feb 0march 0april 0may 0june 8.20july 8.80aug 9.40sept 9.60oct 10.40nov 11.00dec 11.40jan 12.60

Cooper sues company a in state court in south carolina, where he lives, for negligence alleging personal injury and property damage of $100,000 after a truck driven by an employee of company a rear-ended his pickup truck. company a is incorporated in delaware, has its headquarters in new york, but does a substantial amount of business in south carolina. claiming diversity of citizenship, company a seeks removal to federal district court, but cooper opposes the motion. which of the following is true regarding whether the case may be properly removed to federal district court? the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and if company a's nerve center is in a state other than south carolina, then the case may be properly removed to federal court.the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and because company a is incorporated and has its headquarters in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is incorporated in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a's headquarters, nerve center, or principal place of business is located.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is headquartered in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a is incorporated and regardless of the location of its nerve center.because the amount in controversy fails to satisfy jurisdictional requirements, regardless of the location of company a, the case may not be removed to federal court.