During the current year, khalid was in an automobile accident and suffered physical injuries. the accident was caused by rashad’s negligence. khalid threatened to file a lawsuit against ambertrucking company, rashad’s employer, claiming $50,000 for pain and suffering, $90,000 for loss of income, and $70,000 in punitive damages. amber’s insurance company will not pay punitive damages; therefore, amber has offered to settle the case for $100,000 for pain and suffering, $90,000 for loss of income, and nothing for punitive damages. khalid is in the 35% marginal tax bracket. what is the after-tax difference to khalid between khalid’s original claim and amber’s offer?
a. amber’s offer is $20,000 less. ($50,000 + $90,000 + $70,000 – $100,000 – $90,000).b. amber’s offer is $7,000 less. [($50,000 + $90,000 + $70,000 – $100,000 – $90,000) × .35)].c. amber’s offer is $4,500 more. {$190,000 – ($50,000 + $90,000) + [$70,000 × (1 – .35)]}.d. amber’s offer is $22,000 more. [($190,000 – $210,000) + ($120,000 × .35)].e. none of these.