subject
Business, 08.01.2020 01:31 shadow6728g

In lochner v. new york (1905), the supreme court ruled that:

a. the doctrine of separate but equal was constitutional.

b. state regulation of labor practices violated firms' property rights.

c. the fourth amendment did not apply to interstate commerce.

d. factory practices could only be regulated by the states.

e. factory practices could only be regulated by the federal government.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Business

question
Business, 22.06.2019 19:30
The owner of firewood to go is considering buying a hydraulic wood splitter which sells for $50,000. he figures it will cost an additional $100 per cord to purchase and split wood with this machine, while he can sell each cord of split wood for $125. if, for this machine, design capacity is 50 cords per day, effective capacity is 40 cords per day, and actual output is expected to be 32 cords per day, what would be its efficiency?
Answers: 1
question
Business, 23.06.2019 00:50
According to which act will be the person punished
Answers: 1
question
Business, 23.06.2019 03:20
With only a part-time job and the need for a professional wardrobe, rachel quickly maxed out her credit card the summer after graduation. with her first full-time paycheck in august, she vowed to pay $270 each month toward paying down her $8 comma 368 outstanding balance and not to use the card. the card has an annual interest rate of 18 percent. how long will it take rachel to pay for her wardrobe? should she shop for a new card? why or why not?
Answers: 2
question
Business, 23.06.2019 11:20
In march 2012, the state of california started requiring that all packaging for food and drink with the additive 4-methylimidazole (4-mi) be clearly labeled with a cancer warning. because of this, both pepsi and coke changed their formula to eliminate 4-mi as an ingredient. if pepsi and coke did not change their formula, holding all else constant, what would have happened to the demand for these goods, assuming pepsi and coke were in a competitive market? a. the demand curve for both pepsi and coke would have shifted to the right, causing the price of both products to decrease and the profits for the companies to fall. b. the demand curve for pepsi and coke would have remained unchanged, but the price of both products would have decreased and the profits for the companies would have fallen. c. the demand curve for pepsi and coke would have decreased, but the prices and profits would not have changed. d. the demand curve for only one of them would change because pepsi and coke are substitutes. e. the demand curve for pepsi and coke would have shifted to the left, causing the price of both products to decrease and the profits for both companies to fall.
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
In lochner v. new york (1905), the supreme court ruled that:

a. the doctrine of separat...
Questions
question
English, 08.01.2020 13:31
Questions on the website: 13722367