Business, 13.01.2020 19:31 hfuller6219

Find below notes to answer the question:
gail is single and earned $28,000 as a cashier, her only income.
gail's son tony is 17 years old and a full-time student in high school.
tony received social security survivor benefits of $5,000 in 2019. none of those benefits were taxable. he earned $10,000 during the summer working as a website developer. tony had no withholding in box 2 of his form w-2.
he used his social security survivor benefits and wages to provide over half of his own support.
gail and tony lived together all of 2019 and are u. s. citizens with valid social security numbers.
question:
which of the following statements is true?
a. tony is not required to file a tax return because his gross income is below the filing requirement.
b. tony is required to file because his total income is over $12,200.
c. tony is required to file because gail can claim him as a dependent and his income is over $4,200.
d. tony is not required to file because his social security benefits are reported on gail's return.

Answers: 1

Show answers

Another question on Business

Business, 22.06.2019 20:00

Beranek corp has $720,000 of assets, and it uses no debt--it is financed only with common equity. the new cfo wants to employ enough debt to raise the debt/assets ratio to 40%, using the proceeds from borrowing to buy back common stock at its book value. how much must the firm borrow to achieve the target debt ratio? a. $273,600b. $288,000c. $302,400d. $317,520e. $333,396

Answers: 3

Answer

Business, 23.06.2019 01:20

Petra contracted to paint bret’s house for $2,000. after beginning the job, petra realizes that the house is really quite big, and she’s not going to make enough profit, so she tells bret she wants another $500 to finish the job. bret doesn’t want to pay more, but he’s afraid that if she walks off the job, he’ll have trouble finding someone else to finish it, so he agrees. is bret legally obligated to pay the extra $500?

Answers: 2

Answer

Business, 23.06.2019 11:50

Andrew owns a store in polk county. his trade extends throughout river city, but not beyond the county limits. he sells his store to betty and, as part of the transaction, agrees not to engage in the same business anywhere in river city for a period of five years. a. the time restraint is likely reasonable. b. the geographic restraint is likely reasonable. c. the agreement likely violates antitrust laws and the provision is not enforceable. d. both (a) and (b).

Answers: 1

Answer

Business, 24.06.2019 01:30

Carmax is a national chain that sells used cars. the likely impact of its arrival in the market would be to everything else held constant, this would likely the price of used cars.

Answers: 3

Answer

You know the right answer?

Find below notes to answer the question:
gail is single and earned $28,000 as a cashier, her...

Questions