A difference between normative and positive analysis is that…

a. only normative analysis is relevant for choosing among policy options.

b. positive analysis deals with facts and cannot be a source of disagreement.

c. positive analysts ask: "What will happen if they do such and such?" Normative analysts ask: "What do we want to happen?"

d. normative analysis is ignored by economists because they have no expertise in making value judgments.

Via:   "if you are found to be supplying or dealing drugs, the punishment is likely to be tough. supplying drugs doesn’t just apply to dealers. if police suspect that you intend to share drugs with your friends, this is still considered to be supplying.

being suspected of supplying drugs means you are much more likely to be charged. the amount of drugs found on you, and whether you have a criminal record, will be taken into account when a punishment is being decided.

decisions to prosecute are taken by the public prosecution service. the maximum sentences for intent to supply drugs are:

- up to life in prison or an unlimited fine (or both) for a class a drug- up to 14 years in prison or an unlimited fine (or both) for a class b or class c drug."sorry if this was a school question, you didnt supply options so i assumed it was a personal question, which if it is, reconsider selling or having possesion of any drugs at all. i wish you the best!