subject
Business, 12.02.2020 00:03 Bellzers8328

Two consumers, 1 and 2, constitute a small part of the overall economy. The consumers have preferences over the consumption of two traded goods and also over some action taken by consumer 1. Let xi (resp. yi) represent the quantity of the first (resp. second) good consumed by agent i, and let a ≥ 0 be the action taken by consumer 1. Let ui(xi , yi , a) denote consumer i’s utility function, and suppose that u1(x1, y1, a) = x1+ln y1+2a−a 2 and u2(x2, y2, a) = x2+ln y2− a 2 2 + a . The prices of good 1 and 2 are px = 1 and py = 1 2 respectively, and consumer i’s income is wi = 10. (a) Solve for consumer 1’s utility maximizing action and commodity bundle. Solve for consumer 2’s utility maximizing commodity bundle. (b) Show that the allocation found in (a) is inefficient, i. e., that there are alternative allocations that improve at least one consumer’s well being without making anyone else worse off. (c) Find the optimal level of a. (d) Suppose that consumer 1 is made to pay a tax of t per unit of a. Is there a value of t that implements the optimal level of the externality a? (e) Suppose that the government subsidizes the reduction of a as follows: it gives consumer 1 a subsidy of $s for every one unit decrease in a. Is there a value of s that implements the optimal level of the externality a? (f) Suppose that the government assigns the right to an externality-free environment to consumer 2. That is, consumer 1 cannot engage in

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Business

question
Business, 22.06.2019 06:00
Suppose that a monopolistically competitive restaurant is currently serving 260 meals per day (the output where mr
Answers: 2
question
Business, 22.06.2019 07:30
Read the following scenario and answer the question in 5-10 sentences. you are the owner of a small business that is a defendant in a lawsuit in federal court. you received bad news from your lawyer that the judge did not allow certain documents to be admitted as evidence in court and that the jury reached a $50,000 verdict in favor of the plaintiff. your lawyer tells you that it is within your legal right to hire him to file an appeal with the united states court of appeals. if the appellate court rules in your favor, you may be able to avoid paying part or all of the $50,000. evaluate your lawyer’s suggestion about appealing the decision.
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 16:00
In microeconomics, the point at which supply and demand meet is called the blank price
Answers: 3
question
Business, 22.06.2019 18:20
Now ray has had the tires for two months and he notices that the tread has started to pull away from the tire. he has already contacted the place who sold the tires and calmly and accurately explained the problem. they didn’t him because they no longer carry that tire. so he talked with the manager and he still did not get the tire replaced. his consumer rights are being violated. pretend you are ray and write a letter to the company’s headquarters. here are some points to keep in mind when writing the letter: include your name, address, and account number, if appropriate. describe your purchase (name of product, serial numbers, date and location of purchase). state the problem and give the history of how you tried to resolve the problem. ask for a specific action. include how you can be reached.
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Two consumers, 1 and 2, constitute a small part of the overall economy. The consumers have preferenc...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 12.03.2021 02:30
question
Mathematics, 12.03.2021 02:30
question
Mathematics, 12.03.2021 02:30
question
Mathematics, 12.03.2021 02:30
question
Mathematics, 12.03.2021 02:30
Questions on the website: 13722363