Patricia has a valid judgment against David, which she now wishes to execute. David has no assets in the state where the judgment was entered. He has now moved to California where rumor has it he owns thousands of acres of beach-front property. Patricia may execute her judgment in California based on what type of jurisdiction?

Quasi in rem

Explanation:

First of all," quasi in rem" is Latin for "as if against a thing". This jurisdiction principle enables a citizen from another state to take legal action against a citizen of the state based on his/her property rights.

In this case, this means that a California court does have legal rights over David's property and can execute Patricia's valid judgement against it.

3rd the reason why is because of management and leadership