When compared to internal recruitment, an advantage of external recruiting is that . a. its selection process is more rigorous b. it takes lesser time and resources c. recruited employees often require more orientation efforts d. it has the potential to generate larger applicant pools

d. it has the potential to generate larger applicants pools.

Explanation:

A business can choose to fill a vacancy by internal recruitment if it wants to hire or fill the vacancy immediately or if the company work is of complex nature that only internal employees can understand quickly and hiring external will consume time for learning and development. The cons of internal recruitment includes that a company can limit the new talent and fresh blood. The advantage of external recruitment is that it has potential to generate larger pool of applicants and bring new talent, more skilled or qualified candidates can be hired to the company.

The correct answer is letter "D": it has the potential to generate larger applicant pools.

Explanation:

Internal recruiting is the process by which companies try to fill a vacancy using their current workforce. External recruiting, on the other hand, looks for offering the job position available to individuals from outside the companies who could bring new ideas and a set of skills to improve the firm's efficiency.

The main advantage of external recruiting relies on the number of applicants. While internal recruiting counts on a limited number of employees, external recruiting receives an infinite number of applications to fill a few vacancies.

all of them make sense but, i would have to say ask someone who has been there/or lives there, and/or read recent newspapers from that city.

hope this !

answer///supply is elastic, and demand is inelastic;