Two activists were sued by McDonald’s for handing out leaflets accusing the company of paying low wages, cruelty to animals used in its products, and other malpractices. The judge wrote found in favor of McDonald’s, but also agreed with the activists that McDonald’s paid low wages. The judge wrote that McDonalds: "does pay its workers low wages, thereby helping to depress wages for workers in the catering trade in Britain. To this extent the defamatory charge in the leaflet is partly justified."
Assuming that McDonald’s was following all of the relevant labor laws:
1. EVALUATE how well Christopher Stone’s arguments about the MARKET and the LAW do or do not apply with regard to employee wages.

When, MacDonald accepts Christopher's logic then they will take steps to assist their workers in a moral and ethical way.

According to his beliefs, laws are created once at work any harm or misconduct is found.

By their essence they are reactive. It is true, throughout the situation of MacDonald, because they pay the workers low wages and began such a low wage pattern.

The opinions of Christopher refer to MacDonald, because they must be morally culpable.

a recipe serves 8 people, and calls for 5 lbs of apples and 2 cups of flour. you want to prepare it for 24 people. divide 24 by 8 to get 3, and then multiply your ingredients by 3.

so for 24 people, you'll need 15 lbs of apples, and 6 cups of flour.