subject
Business, 24.02.2020 17:22 dasharia

Michael had all his money in an investment portfolio that was moderately risky. The stock market fell and caused him to lose a lot of his money. In response, he then invested in a portfolio with a much higher potential payoff, but a lower expected value. How might an economist explain Michael's behavior

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Business

question
Business, 22.06.2019 09:00
Aminor has the legal right to repudiate
Answers: 2
question
Business, 22.06.2019 11:20
Aborrower takes out a 30-year adjustable rate mortgage loan for $200,000 with monthly payments. the first two years of the loan have a "teaser" rate of 4%, after that, the rate can reset with a 5% annual payment cap. on the reset date, the composite rate is 6%. what would the year 3 monthly payment be?
Answers: 3
question
Business, 22.06.2019 11:30
Leticia has worked for 20 years in the public relations department of a large firm and has been the vice-president for the past ten years. it is unlikely she will ever be promoted to the top executive position in her firm even though she has directed several successful projects and is quite capable. her lack of promotion is an illustration of (a) the "glass ceiling" (b) the "glass elevator" (c) the "mommy track" (d) sexual harassment
Answers: 3
question
Business, 22.06.2019 16:30
Why is investing in a mutual fund less risky than investing in a particular company’s stock?
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Michael had all his money in an investment portfolio that was moderately risky. The stock market fel...
Questions
question
Geography, 16.07.2019 14:00
question
History, 16.07.2019 14:00
Questions on the website: 13722360