Beierling conceived a plan to develop educational software for teachers. after sharing her idea with Katie Urbain and Maureen Clinesmith, the three women formed a partnership. The partner- ship planned to stream online games into classrooms through paid subscriptions. Clinesmith initially loaned the partnership $10,000 and the three decided to receive equal portions of the profit, after the repayment of Clinesmith’s loan. after several months, the partnership began to have problems. Clinesmith and Beierling told Urbain that she was no longer a partner and blocked her access to the partnership e-mail account. They dissolved the partnership, which never made a profit. while wind- ing up the affairs of the partnership, Clinesmith assessed the value of partnership’s limited assets and assumed ownership of the assets, since they were less than the $10,000 loan she made to the partnership. Urbain sued Clinesmith and Beierling, stating that the partnership was wrongfully dis- solved and that she was entitled to damages. was she correct?

Which financial component is a mandatory deduction from your gross pay? a. sales tax b. social security tax c. health insurance d. disaster relief fund (drf) e. voluntary deduction

The company financial officer was interested in the average cost of pcs that had been purchased in the past six months. she took a random sample of the price of 10 computers, with the following results. $3,250, $1,127, $2,995, $3,250, $3,445, $3,449, $1,482, $6,120, $3,009, $4,000 what is the iqr?

Richardson hired j.c. flood company, a plumbing contractor, to correct a stoppage in the sewer line of her house. the plumbing company's 'snake' device, used to clear the line leading to the main sewer, became caught in the underground line. to release it, the company excavated a portion of the sewer line in richardson's backyard. in the process, the company discovered numerous leaks in a rusty, defective water pipe that ran parallel with the sewer line. to meet public regulations, the water pipe, of a type no longer approved for such service, had to be replaced either then or later, when the yard would have to be excavated again. the plumbing company proceeded to repair the water pipe. though richardson inspected the company's work daily and did not express any objection to the extra work involved in replacing the water pipe, she refused to pay any part of the total bill after the company completed the entire operation. j.c. flood company then sued richardson for the costs of labor and material it had furnished. (c) for what, if anything, should richardson be liable? explain."