An officer of International Sales Corporation makes overtures to a representative of Global Distribution, Inc., regarding a business deal. Under the objective theory of contracts, the officer's words and conduct are held to mean whatever
a. the officer subjectively intended them to mean.
b. a reasonable person in the officer's position would think they meant.
c. a reasonable person in the representative's position would think they meant.
d. the representative subjectively thought they meant

C

Explanation:

An officer of International Sales Corporation makes overtures to a representative of Global Distribution, Inc., regarding a business deal. Under the objective theory of contracts, the officer's words and conduct are held to mean whatever a reasonable person in the representative's position would think they meant

The objective theory of contracts holds that an agreement between parties is legally binding if, in the opinion of a reasonable person who is not a party to the contract, an offer has been made and accepted. It just has to be a mutual assent not necessarily a written or binding contract. Mutual assent is considered the meeting of the minds between two or more parties that forms the foundation of a contract. At the time of mutual assent, it can be said that a legally binding contract exists. There is also a mutual understanding of what each party promises and that the promise can be carried out as agreed. The court will weigh this two things, offer and acceptance, when making a decision on whether both parties actually reached mutual assent.

its simple as this, microeconomics is the study of economics at an individual, group or company level, macroeconomics on the other hand, is the study of a national economy as a whole.

hope it =^-^=

all of them make sense but, i would have to say ask someone who has been there/or lives there, and/or read recent newspapers from that city.

hope this !