Consider the following analysis: The rise and fall of a bond's price has a direct inverse relationship to its yield to maturity, or interest rate. As prices go up, the yield declines and vice versa. For example, a $1 comma 000 bond might carry a stated annual yield, known as the coupon of 8%, meaning that it pays $80 a year to the bondholder. If that bond was bought for $880, the actual yield to maturity would be 9.09% ($80 annual interest on $880 of principal). Do you agree with this analysis? Briefly explain.

Yes, I am agree with the investigation.  

Securities pay a fixed level of intrigue, called the coupon rate, which is determined all over worth. In the model given, a $1,000 face esteem security having a coupon pace of 8 percent, pays $80 in intrigue every year.  

Be that as it may, the loan fees will undoubtedly shift, i.e.; go here and there, as per the economic situations.  

For example, if in the model given, one year after the issue, the loan fees for comparable obligations of development of 9 years goes up to 9%, at that point no one will purchase the bond for $1000, as the purchaser will get just $80 or 8% return every year. Rather the forthcoming purchaser can purchase comparative securities from the market that would yield 9%. At the end of the day the bond in our model would have a cost on which $80 works out to 9%, ie; it might have a value equivalent to 80/.0.09 = $888.89.  

Invert is the situation if the financing costs fall. For example if the market loan cost tumbles to 7%, the investor might want to sell it at a more significant expense just, with the goal that the enthusiasm of $80 works out to 7%. The cost of the bond could be 80/0.07 = $1142.86.  

Cost and yield:  

In the event that the bond value tumbles to $800, one needs to contribute less to purchase the bond. The powerful loan cost (yield) would be $80 isolated by $800 which is equivalent to 10 percent. This turn around is valid too. In the event that the security value transcends the presumptive worth, one needs to contribute more and the yield descends.

are you looking for a specific answer?