John is a low-level employee at an accounting firm. In his duty as an employee at the firm, John forges documents and signatures on documents regarding the firm's clients. John does this because his boss asked him to. Although the boss asked John to commit the forgery, his boss had no direct action in creating the documents or forging the signatures. Now the company is being sued. In addition to the company's liability, which of the following persons potentially could be held personally liable for a corporate crime? I. John II. John's manager III. The CEO, who in this specific case we assume could have prevented the crime.

Who got instagram! ? if you do give it to me

On september 1, 2016, steve loaned brett $2,000 at 12% interest compounded annually. steve is not in the business of lending money. the note stated that principal and interest would be due on august 31, 2018. in 2018, steve received $2,508.80 ($2,000 principal and $508.80 interest). steve uses the cash method of accounting. what amount must steve include in income on his income tax return?

David consumes two things: gasoline (g) and bread (b). david's utility function is u(g, b) = 10g^0.25 b^0.75. use the lagrange technique to solve for david's optimal choices of gasoline and bread as a function of the price of gasoline, p_g, the price of bread, p_b, and his income m. with recent decrease in the price of gasoline (maybe due to external shock such as shale gas production) does david increase his consumption of gasoline? for david, how does partial differential g/partial differential p_g depend on his income m? that is, how does david's change in gasoline consumption due to an increase in the price of gasoline depend on his income level? to answer these questions, find the cross-partial derivative, |partial differential^2 g/partial differential m partial differential p_g.