A contractor used dynamite to loosen a rocky hillside. The blast from the dynamite caused a house foundation to crack. The house was located over a half-mile away from the dynamite site. The contractor was careful when using the dynamite and no allegation of negligence is made. However, the house owner claims the contractor is liable for damage to the foundation. Is the house owner correct?Explain.

Answer and explanation:

The house owner is correct because strict liability applies in the case. Strict liability refers to the responsibility an individual or organization has over actions incurred even if there was no intention of causing property or personal injuries. Strict liability only considers if the action was the result of the damage.

The assertion that could be made regarding the given situation would be as follows:

Yes, the house owner is correct under the term of "strict liability."

Learn more about "Contractor" here:

link

typically a loft will include modern kitchen and bathrooms, this increases the price tag. lofts also have a good amount of open space, this requires more heating and electricity. lofts are also in older buildings, this means that maintaining the location increases the bill. keep in mind this is without talking about the high state and property taxes.

i hope this you! : )