subject
Business, 17.03.2020 03:12 exoticbunnylover123

A. Joe owned a home in Rose City. On July 1, 2008, he renewed his homeowner’s policy on the home and paid the premium for a year. The home was worth $100,000 and he insured it for that amount. On August 15, 2008, he was promoted at work, but was required to move to Junction City to take the job. He placed his home up for sale with local real estate agent. On September 1 the house was sold for $100,000 to Jon. The closing on the home sale was conducted on September 15, 2008, at which time Joe was paid in full for the home. Jon moved in later that day. On October 4, 2008 the home was completely destroyed by fire. After the fire Jon realized he had failed to insure the house. When Jon told Joe of his situation, Joe realized he had failed to cancel his own coverage on the home. To help Jon out, Joe filed a claim on his policy for the loss, with the intention of giving the money from the proceeds of the claim to Jon.

B. Same situation as above except Joe financed the home sale to Jon. Jon paid Joe $50,000 down and was scheduled to make monthly payments for the remainder (contract for deed). The contract contained a clause that required Jon to insure the home and instruct the insurance company to name Joe as loss payee on the policy. As in the above case, Jon failed to insure the house. The house completely burned on October 4, 2008.

Would Joe be able to collect on his policy, what amount if any, and why?

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Business

question
Business, 22.06.2019 04:40
How long have u been on dis website
Answers: 2
question
Business, 22.06.2019 16:50
Coop inc. owns 40% of chicken inc., both coop and chicken are corporations. chicken pays coop a dividend of $10,000 in the current year. chicken also reports financial accounting earnings of $20,000 for that year. assume coop follows the general rule of accounting for investment in chicken. what is the amount and nature of the book-tax difference to coop associated with the dividend distribution (ignoring the dividends received deduction)?
Answers: 2
question
Business, 22.06.2019 19:50
Managers in a firm hired to improve the firm's profitability and ultimately the shareholders' value will add to the overall costs if they pursue their own self-interests. what does this best illustrate? a. diseconomies of scale b. principal-agent problem c. experience-curveeffects d. information asymmetries
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 21:00
An important source of public scrutiny is "watchdogs." these are: the efforts of a firm's competitors, including how often the competitors attack the firm's strategies. taxpayer-supported government agencies that limit a firm's ability to compete in foreign markets. companies designated by the government to only produce products that support the government defense program. socially conscious groups that make it their mission to measure the social responsibility levels of businesses, and provide consumers with their opinions about the level of corporate responsibility of various companies.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
A. Joe owned a home in Rose City. On July 1, 2008, he renewed his homeowner’s policy on the home and...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 05.05.2021 16:30
question
Spanish, 05.05.2021 16:30
question
English, 05.05.2021 16:30
question
Mathematics, 05.05.2021 16:30
Questions on the website: 13722362