David, the marketing director of an automobile manufacturing company, enrolled a new group of trainees in experiential programs based on the responses evoked during a training session. Which response by the trainees could have resulted in their enrollment in experiential programs?

A. The trainees expressed a desire to involve themselves in virtual realities that provided an interactive and three-dimensional learning experience.
B. The trainees expressed a desire to partake in training sessions that involved observing the behavior of others and practicing it themselves.
C. The trainees expressed a desire to create computer depictions of themselves, which could be manipulated onscreen to play roles as workers in various situations.
D. The trainees expressed a desire to evaluate themselves and see the impact of their decisions in a risk-free environment.
E. The trainees expressed a desire to be challenged and get out outside of their comfort zone but within limits that kept their motivation strong.

Which of the following is an example of a production quota? a. the government sets an upper limit on the quantity that each dairy farmer can produce. b. the government sets a price floor in the market for dairy products. c. the government sets a lower limit on the quantity that each dairy farmer can produce. d. the government guarantees to buy a specified quantity of dairy products from farmers.

What do you recommend adam do to increase production in a business setting that does not seem to value high productivity?

Cooper sues company a in state court in south carolina, where he lives, for negligence alleging personal injury and property damage of $100,000 after a truck driven by an employee of company a rear-ended his pickup truck. company a is incorporated in delaware, has its headquarters in new york, but does a substantial amount of business in south carolina. claiming diversity of citizenship, company a seeks removal to federal district court, but cooper opposes the motion. which of the following is true regarding whether the case may be properly removed to federal district court? the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and if company a's nerve center is in a state other than south carolina, then the case may be properly removed to federal court.the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and because company a is incorporated and has its headquarters in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is incorporated in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a's headquarters, nerve center, or principal place of business is located.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is headquartered in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a is incorporated and regardless of the location of its nerve center.because the amount in controversy fails to satisfy jurisdictional requirements, regardless of the location of company a, the case may not be removed to federal court.