subject
Business, 21.03.2020 00:04 michaellowe8434

Which of the following best explain why the pain of losing $1,000 exceeds the pleasure of winning $1,000 for risk-averse people? Check all that apply. Risk-averse people overestimate the probability of losing money. The more wealth that risk-averse people have, the less satisfaction they receive from an additional dollar. The more wealth that risk-averse people have, the more satisfaction they receive from an additional dollar. The utility function of a risk-averse person exhibits the law of diminishing marginal utility.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Business

question
Business, 22.06.2019 09:00
You speak to a business owner that is taking in almost $2000 in revenue each month. the owner still says that they are having trouble keeping the doors open. how can that be possible? use the terms of revenue, expenses and profit/loss in your answer
Answers: 3
question
Business, 22.06.2019 12:30
Suppose that two firms produce differentiated products and compete in prices. as in class, the two firms are located at two ends of a line one mile apart. consumers are evenly distributed along the line. the firms have identical marginal cost, $60. firm b produces a product with value $110 to consumers.firm a (located at 0 on the unit line) produces a higher quality product with value $120 to consumers. the cost of travel are directly related to the distance a consumer travels to purchase a good. if a consumerhas to travel a mile to purchase a good, the incur a cost of $20. if they have to travel x fraction of a mile, they incur a cost of $20x. (a) write down the expressions for how much a consumer at location d would value the products sold by firms a and b, if they set prices p_{a} and p_{b} ? (b) based on your expressions in (a), how much will be demanded from each firm if prices p_{a} and p_{b} are set? (c) what are the nash equilibrium prices?
Answers: 3
question
Business, 22.06.2019 13:30
Jose recently died with a probate estate of $900,000. he was predeceased by his wife, guadalupe, and his daughter, lucy. he has two surviving children, pete and fred. jose was also survived by eight grandchildren, pete’s three children, naomi, daniel, nick; fred’s three children, heather, chris and steve; and lucy’s two children, david and rachel. jose’s will states the following “i leave everything to my three children. if any of my children shall predecease me then i leave their share to their heirs, per stirpes.” which of the following statements is correct? (a) under jose’s will rachel will receive $150,000. (b) under jose’s will chris will receive $150,000. (c) under jose’s will nick will receive $100,000. (d) under jose’s will pete will receive $200,000.
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 15:10
Popeye produces 20 cans of spinach in 8 hours. wimpy produces 15 hamburgers in 10 hours. if each hamburger trades for 1.5 cans of spinach, then: a.wimpy’s production and productivity are greater than popeye’s. b.popeye’s production is greater than wimpy’s, but his productivity is less. c.wimpy’s production is greater than popeye’s, but his productivity is less. d.popeye’s production and productivity are greater than wimpy’s.
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Which of the following best explain why the pain of losing $1,000 exceeds the pleasure of winning $1...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 05.12.2020 21:20
question
Mathematics, 05.12.2020 21:20
question
Mathematics, 05.12.2020 21:20
question
Mathematics, 05.12.2020 21:20
question
Mathematics, 05.12.2020 21:20
question
History, 05.12.2020 21:20
Questions on the website: 13722363