Based on the information contained in Coca-Cola's and PepsiCo's financial statements, compute the following 2014 ratios for each company. These ratios require the use of statement of cash flows data. (These ratios were covered in Chapter 5.)

Current cash debt coverage.

Coca Cola= 28%

Pepsi Co’S=34%

(2) Cash debt coverage.

Coca Cola= 15%

Pepsi Co’S= 12%

What conclusions concerning the management of cash can be drawn from the ratios computed in (e the question and answer that is not in the bold font)?

Current money obligation coverage is determined by partitioning net money gave by working exercises by the normal absolute liabilities.  

It shows the amount of the organization's absolute liabilities can be secured (paid) with net money from working exercises. As it were, this proportion is one of the proportions of the organization's money related adaptability and steadiness.  

In the given instance of Coca-Cola and Pepsi the Current money inclusion proportion of Pepsi is higher (34%) when contrasted with Coca-cola(28%). This implies Pepsi money age from its working activities is better when contrasted with its Average all out liabilities than Coca-Cola. This proportion shows that if Pepsi is producing money from activity to the sum it can pay 34% of its normal all out liabilities where as coca-cola can create 28% money from tasks to take care of normal complete liabilities. In the given money pepsi is better.  

Money obligation proportion is a little deviation from Current obligation proportion as from the numerator "income from activities" , profit is subtracted and afterwards the equalization money is separated by the normal absolute liabilities.  

For the Coco-cola and Pepsi case , this proportion is better for Coca-cola that implies Coca-cola delivers less profits when contrasted with Pepsi that is the reason the rate inclusion of Pepsi is diminished from 34% to 12%(22% decline) and Coca-cola decrease is just 13%.

answer; lags, push the econ below the natural level of output;