The Clarion Company provides a one-year warranty on all merchandise it sells. In Year 1, the company recorded sales of $500,000. It estimated that the warranty costs on these sales would amount to $2,000. In July, Year 2, Clarion paid $250 to satisfy a warranty claim. Indicate whether each of the following statements is true or false. a) Clarion's recognition of the warranty obligation at the end of Year 1 reduced total assets and total equity. b) Clarion's recognition of the warranty obligation at the end of Year 1 increased Clarion's total liabilities. c) The July, Year 2 transaction reduced total assets and net income for Year 2. d) The July, Year 2 transaction reduced Clarion's total liabilities. e) The recognition of the warranty obligation at the end of

Lynch company manufactures and sells a single product. the following costs were incurred during the company’s first year of operations: variable costs per unit: manufacturing: direct materials $ 12 direct labor $ 6 variable manufacturing overhead $ 1 variable selling and administrative $ 1 fixed costs per year: fixed manufacturing overhead $ 308,000 fixed selling and administrative $ 218,000 during the year, the company produced 28,000 units and sold 15,000 units. the selling price of the company’s product is $56 per unit. required: 1. assume that the company uses absorption costing: a. compute the unit product cost. b. prepare an income statement for the year. 2. assume that the company uses variable costing: a. compute the unit product cost. b. prepare an income statement for the year.

In the united states, one worker can produce 10 tons of steel per day or 20 tons of chemicals per day. in the united kingdom, one worker can produce 5 tons of steel per day or 15 tons of chemicals per day. the united kingdom has a comparative advantage in the production of:

David paid $975,000 for two beachfront lots in coastal south carolina, with the intention of building residential homes on each. two years later, the south carolina legislature passed the beachfront management act, barring any further development of the coast, including david's lots. when david files a complaint to seek compensation for his property, south carolina refuses, pointing to a passage in david's own complaint that states "the beachfront management act [was] properly and validly designed to south carolina's " is south carolina required to compensate david under the takings clause?