In the United States, where land is cheap, the ratio of land to labor used in cattle raising is higher than that of land used in wheat growing. But in more crowded countries, where land is expensive and labor is cheap, it is common to raise cows by using less land and more labor than Americans use to grow wheat. Can we still say that raising cattle is land-intensive compared to farming wheat? Why or why not?

The meaning of dairy cattle becoming as land escalated relies upon the proportion of land to work utilized underway, not on the proportion of land or work to yield. The proportion of land to work in  dairy cattle surpasses the proportion in wheat in the United States, inferring steers is land escalated in  the United States. Dairy cattle is land escalated in different nations also if the proportion of land to  work in dairy cattle creation surpasses the proportion in wheat creation in that nation.  Examinations between another nation and the United States is less significant for this  reason.  

Raising dairy cattle is never more land escalated contrasted with developing wheat or other vegetable items, basically in light of the fact that eating creatures are wasteful makers of eatable tissue. In nations where meat is utilized more as a sauce than as the principle wellspring of protein in the eating routine, a large portion of a section of land is adequate to develop nourishment for one individual. It takes multiple times more land to deliver meat than grain for a similar measure of nourishment vitality.

hi i’m a student too and i’ve had this app downalodes for a few weeks people do answer it you just gotta be patient and what is your question + subject i’ll you?

i think the answer to your question is b. directive