Sachs Brands' defined benefit pension plan specifies annual retirement benefits equal to: 1.6% � service years � final year's salary, payable at the end of each year. Angela Davenport was hired by Sachs at the beginning of 1999 and is expected to retire at the end of 2033 after 35 years' service. Her retirement is expected to span 18 years. Davenport's salary is $90,000 at the end of 2013 and the company's actuary projects her salary to be $240,000 at retirement. The actuary's discount rate is 7%. (FV of $1, PV of $1, FVA of $1, PVA of $1, FVAD of $1 and PVAD of $1) (Use appropriate factor(s) from the tables provided.)

Required:
1.
What is the company's projected benefit obligation at the beginning of 2013 (after 14 years' service) with respect to Davenport?

2.
Estimate by the projected benefits approach the portion of Davenport's annual retirement payments attributable to 2013 service.

3.
What is the company's service cost for 2013 with respect to Davenport?

4.
What is the company's interest cost for 2013 with respect to Davenport?

5.
Combine your answers to requirements 1, 3, and 4 to determine the company's projected benefit obligation at the end of 2013 (after 15 years' service) with respect to Davenport.

German brothels recently began offering a monthly subscription service for multiple purchasers. if you thought that the brothels' encouragement of prostitution was immoral to begin with, would you consider this pricing plan to be even more immoral? suppose a particular patron at a german brothel has the following willingness-to-pay schedule for services at the brothel, per session. session willingness to pay 1st $84 2nd $72 3rd $60 4th $48 5th $36 6th $24 suppose this consumer would not demand any more sessions, even for free. also assume that the marginal cost to the brothel, per session, is constant at $12. at a price of $78.00 per session, the number of sessions demanded by this consumer would be . at this price and quantity, consumer surplus is $ and producer surplus is $ . suppose the brothel has devised a new pricing scheme for consumers who demand more than 1 session. this pricing scheme is a subscription service, whereby consumers can pay a flat fee of $259.20 and can have up to 6 sessions total. using this subscription pricing model, this consumer would demand sessions. under this scenario, consumer surplus is $ and producer surplus is $ . (hint: for consumer surplus, consider how much total value the consumer places on all sessions, versus the total price paid.)