subject
Business, 18.04.2020 04:56 lel11

. Understanding how shirking decreases team output Caroline sells bottled water from a small stand by the beach. On the last day of summer vacation, many people are on the beach, and Caroline realizes that she can make a lot more money this day if she hires someone to walk up and down the beach selling water. She finds a college student named Antonio and makes him the following offer: They'll each sell water all day and split their earnings (revenue minus the cost of water) equally at the end of the day. Caroline knows that if they both work hard, Antonio will earn $90 on the beach and Caroline will earn $180 at her stand, so they will each take home half of their total revenue: . If Antonio shirks, he'll generate only $50 in earnings. Caroline does not know that Antonio estimates his personal cost (or disutility) of working hard as opposed to shirking at $25.

Once out of Caroline's sight, Antonio faces a dilemma: work hard (put in full effort) or shirk (put in low effort).

In terms of Antonio's total utility, it is better for him to (shirk or work hard?)

Taking into account the loss in utility that working hard brings to Antonio, Caroline and Antonio together (are/ are not) ff if Antonio works hard instead of shirking.

Caroline knows Antonio will shirk if unsupervised. She considers hiring her good friend Carrie, who happens to be free on that day, to keep an eye on Antonio. The most Caroline should be willing to pay Carrie to supervise Antonio, assuming supervision is sufficient to encourage Antonio to work hard, is (25, 20, 45, 15)

Caroline knows Antonio will shirk if unsupervised, but she could not find a reliable person to watch him. Which of the following arrangements will ensure that Antonio works hard without making Caroline any worse off than she is when Antonio shirks?

Allow Antonio to keep 73% of the revenue from the bottles of water he sells instead of 50%

Make Antonio promise to work hard Pay Antonio $70, regardless of how many bottles of water he sells

Allow Antonio to keep 70% of the revenue from the bottles of water he sells instead of 50%

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Business

question
Business, 21.06.2019 22:30
Your project team’s recommendations to increase productivity have been approved and your team is now working on an implementation plan. in order to accomplish the plan, several subject matter experts from various parts of the organization have been brought in to assist. you have noticed friction and conflict among team members. some of the disagreement and opposition on your team supports the achievement of team goals and objectives. this type of conflict can be described as:
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 16:30
:; )write a paragraph of two to three sentences and describe what will happen to a society that does not have a productive workforce?
Answers: 3
question
Business, 22.06.2019 20:00
Because this market is a monopolistically competitive market, you can tell that it is in long-run equilibrium by the fact thatmr=mc at the optimal quantity for each firm. furthermore, a monopolistically competitive firm's average total cost in long-run equilibrium isless than the minimum average total cost. true or false: this indicates that there is a markup on marginal cost in the market for engines. true false monopolistic competition may also be socially inefficient because there are too many or too few firms in the market. the presence of the externality implies that there is too little entry of new firms in the market.
Answers: 3
question
Business, 22.06.2019 22:30
Rahm's credit card issuer calculates interest based on the outstanding balance at the end of the last billing period. what is this method of calculating interest on a credit card called?
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
. Understanding how shirking decreases team output Caroline sells bottled water from a small stand b...
Questions
Questions on the website: 13722359