Lucas Corporation uses the weighted-average method in its process costing system. Data concerning the first processing department for the most recent month are listed below: Beginning work in process inventory: Units in beginning work in process inventory 900 Materials costs $ 9,600 Conversion costs $ 7,700 Percent complete with respect to materials 60 % Percent complete with respect to conversion 45 % Units started into production during the month 8,100 Units transferred to the next department during the month 6,900 Materials costs added during the month $ 115,800 Conversion costs added during the month $ 120,500 Ending work in process inventory: Units in ending work in process inventory 2,100 Percent complete with respect to materials 75 % Percent complete with respect to conversion 20 % The cost per equivalent unit for conversion costs for the first department for the month is closest to: Garrison 16e Rechecks 2017-08-28 Multiple Choice $14.24 $18.39 $17.51 $16.46

Cooper sues company a in state court in south carolina, where he lives, for negligence alleging personal injury and property damage of $100,000 after a truck driven by an employee of company a rear-ended his pickup truck. company a is incorporated in delaware, has its headquarters in new york, but does a substantial amount of business in south carolina. claiming diversity of citizenship, company a seeks removal to federal district court, but cooper opposes the motion. which of the following is true regarding whether the case may be properly removed to federal district court? the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and if company a's nerve center is in a state other than south carolina, then the case may be properly removed to federal court.the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and because company a is incorporated and has its headquarters in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is incorporated in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a's headquarters, nerve center, or principal place of business is located.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is headquartered in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a is incorporated and regardless of the location of its nerve center.because the amount in controversy fails to satisfy jurisdictional requirements, regardless of the location of company a, the case may not be removed to federal court.