In his book The Optimum Quantity of Money, Milton Friedman talks about a helicopter dropping $2,000 over a community. The cash dropped by the helicopter gives the people in this community more money to spend. A tax cut also has the same effect: it increases disposable income. Suppose tax cuts, analogous to the helicopter drop, were proposed as a method to shift the labor demand curve to the right following a recession. How effective do you think this policy would be? A. Somewhat effective, but only to the extent that most of the tax cut is concurrently spent on domestic output, that multiplier effects occur, and crowding out is small. B. Very effective, since tax cuts are concentrated among wealthy individuals who usually spend all or most of the extra income. C. Not effective, since the majority of the tax cut is saved and any portion spent leads to complete crowding out. D. Not effective, since the tax cuts go to consumers rather than to the employers (demanders) of labor.

A) Somewhat effective, but only to the extent that most of the tax cut is concurrently spent on domestic output, that multiplier effects occur, and crowding out is small.

Explanation:

First of all, the larger amount of money would increase the inflation rate since aggregate supply hasn't increased. The number of goods and services offered do not vary, then only thing that varies is the amount of disposable money.

The larger the multiplier, the larger the positive effect. The multiplier formula = 1 / MPS (marginal propensity to save). Even though inflation increases, still the economy is going to grow. That unless the local residents decide to purchase many imported goods. The larger the amount of imported goods purchased, the lower the positive effects.

This type of policy can be very effective under conditions where deflation or inflation rates are near 0 or even negative. Although high inflation is very bad for the economy, a small amount of inflation is always needed to boost economic growth. The healthy inflation is around 1.5 - 2% per year. This way salaries and wages can grow, pushing aggregate demand and supply.

explanation: doctrine of respondeat superior is a legal doctrine that is commonly used in tort. this principle makes an employer or principal legally responsible for the wrongful acts done by an employee or agent, if such acts occur within the scope of the employment or agency.