Suppose that the labor market for medical researchers is perfectly competitive, but employers of researchers have only imperfect information about the productivity of any researcher. Researchers come from one of two groups: A and B. The following statements describe the information that employers have about researchers: (i) they know that, on average, researchers from group A are more productive than researchers from group B; and (ii) they know that the worker-specific information that they observe is equally informative for researchers from group A and researchers from group B. According to the statistical discrimination model, which of the following statements about equilibrium wages of researchers is correct?
Group of answer choices

A. A researcher from group A will receive a higher wage than a researcher from group B with identical individual credentials only if the individual credentials are "above average"

B. A researcher from group A will receive a higher wage than a researcher from group B with identical individual credentials only if the individual credentials are "below average"

C. A researcher from group A always will receive a higher wage than a researcher from group B with identical individual credentials

D. Wages will vary less among researchers from group A than among researchers from group B

Cooper sues company a in state court in south carolina, where he lives, for negligence alleging personal injury and property damage of $100,000 after a truck driven by an employee of company a rear-ended his pickup truck. company a is incorporated in delaware, has its headquarters in new york, but does a substantial amount of business in south carolina. claiming diversity of citizenship, company a seeks removal to federal district court, but cooper opposes the motion. which of the following is true regarding whether the case may be properly removed to federal district court? the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and if company a's nerve center is in a state other than south carolina, then the case may be properly removed to federal court.the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and because company a is incorporated and has its headquarters in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is incorporated in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a's headquarters, nerve center, or principal place of business is located.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is headquartered in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a is incorporated and regardless of the location of its nerve center.because the amount in controversy fails to satisfy jurisdictional requirements, regardless of the location of company a, the case may not be removed to federal court.