Essentially, the court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs and determined that the defendants did in fact breach a joint venture agreement. What theory or theories decision making might lead a judge to rule in favor of the defendants instead? Who in the business community would be affected if this theory of ethical decision making was employed? Explain.

This app is rigge im si mad

Having a long credit that will be corrected is better that a short credit that is clear is simply because with long credit history, a prospective lender can see how you have operated your credit facility over a considerable period. nobody's credit history is perfect - everyone has at least 1 or 2 lapses on their record. have short history of your credit doesn't show patterns or trends of persistent late payments.

Answer gross private domestic investment (gpdi);

No damages at all have a great day