subject
Business, 06.05.2020 03:15 bensleytristap93y8q

Breakdown of a cartel agreement Consider a town in which only two residents, Jake and Latasha, own wells that produce water safe for drinking. Jake and Latasha can pump and sell as much water as they want at no cost. For them, total revenue equals profit. The following table shows the town's demand schedule for water. Price Quantity Demanded Total Revenue (Dollars per gallon) (Gallons of water) (Dollars) 3.60 0 0 3.30 35 $115.50 3.00 70 $210.00 2.70 105 $283.50 2.40 140 $336.00 2.10 175 $367.50 1.80 210 $378.00 1.50 245 $367.50 1.20 280 $336.00 0.90 315 $283.50 0.60 350 $210.00 0.30 385 $115.50 0 420 0 Suppose Jake and Latasha form a cartel and behave as a monopolist. The profit-maximizing price is per gallon, and the total output is gallons. As part of their cartel agreement, Jake and Latasha agree to split production equally. Therefore, Jake's profit is , and Latasha's profit is . Suppose that Jake and Latasha have been successfully operating as a cartel. They each charge the monopoly price and sell half of the monopoly quantity. Then one night before going to sleep, Jake says to himself, "Latasha and I aren't the best of friends anyway. If I increase my production to 35 gallons more than the cartel amount, I can increase my profit even though her profit goes down. I will do that starting tomorrow." After Jake implements his new plan, the price of waterincreases to per gallon. Given Latasha and Jake's production levels, Jake's profit becomes and Latasha's profit becomes . Because Jake has deviated from the cartel agreement and increased his output of water to 35 gallons more than the cartel amount, Latasha decides that she will also increase her production to 35 gallons more than the cartel amount. After Latasha increases her production, Jake's profit becomes , Latasha's profit becomes , and total profit (the sum of the profits of Jake and Latasha) is now . True or False: Based on the fact that both Jake and Latasha increased production from the initial cartel quantity, you know that the output effect was smaller than the price effect at that quantity. True False Jake and Latasha have each cheated on their cartel agreement and increased production by 35 gallons more than the cartel amount. However, they both realize that if they continue to increase output beyond this amount, they'll each suffer a decrease in profit. (To see this for yourself, consider Jake's profit when he produces 70 gallons more than the cartel amount compared to his profit when he produces 35 gallons more than the cartel amount.) Neither Jake nor Latasha has an incentive to further increase output, nor does either have an incentive to decrease output. This outcome is an example oftying .

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Business

question
Business, 22.06.2019 05:20
142"what is the value of n? soefon11402bebe99918+19: 00esseeshop60-990 0esle
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 12:30
Suppose that two firms produce differentiated products and compete in prices. as in class, the two firms are located at two ends of a line one mile apart. consumers are evenly distributed along the line. the firms have identical marginal cost, $60. firm b produces a product with value $110 to consumers.firm a (located at 0 on the unit line) produces a higher quality product with value $120 to consumers. the cost of travel are directly related to the distance a consumer travels to purchase a good. if a consumerhas to travel a mile to purchase a good, the incur a cost of $20. if they have to travel x fraction of a mile, they incur a cost of $20x. (a) write down the expressions for how much a consumer at location d would value the products sold by firms a and b, if they set prices p_{a} and p_{b} ? (b) based on your expressions in (a), how much will be demanded from each firm if prices p_{a} and p_{b} are set? (c) what are the nash equilibrium prices?
Answers: 3
question
Business, 22.06.2019 14:30
Amethod of allocating merchandise cost that assumes the first merchandise bought was the first merchandise sold is called the a. last-in, first-out method. b. first-in, first-out method. c. specific identification method. d. average cost method.
Answers: 3
question
Business, 22.06.2019 19:00
Tri fecta, a partnership, had revenues of $369,000 in its first year of operations. the partnership has not collected on $45,000 of its sales and still owes $39,500 on $155,000 of merchandise it purchased. there was no inventory on hand at the end of the year. the partnership paid $27,000 in salaries. the partners invested $48,000 in the business and $23,000 was borrowed on a five-year note. the partnership paid $2,070 in interest that was the amount owed for the year and paid $9,500 for a two-year insurance policy on the first day of business. compute net income for the first year for tri fecta.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Breakdown of a cartel agreement Consider a town in which only two residents, Jake and Latasha, own w...
Questions
Questions on the website: 13722363