Explain why full employment may be inconsistent with no shirking. Shirking may be likely with full employment because A. it may be inexpensive for employees to shirk. B. it may be possible for employers to pay high wages. C. it may be costless for employers to fire employees. D. it may not be possible for employees to have asymmetric information. E. it may be easy for employers to monitor workers.
Answers: 2
Business, 23.06.2019 01:30
James jones is the owner of a small retail business operated as a sole proprietorship. during 2017, his business recorded the following items of income and expense: revenue from inventory sales $ 147,000 cost of goods sold 33,500 business license tax 2,400 rent on retail space 42,000 supplies 15,000 wages paid to employees 22,000 payroll taxes 1,700 utilities 3,600 compute taxable income attributable to the sole proprietorship by completing schedule c to be included in james’s 2017 form 1040. compute self-employment tax payable on the earnings of james’s sole proprietorship by completing a 2017 schedule se, form 1040. assume your answers to parts a and b are the same for 2018. further assume that james's business is not a service business, and that it has $155,000 unadjusted basis in tangible depreciable property. calculate james's 2018 section 199a deduction.
Answers: 1
Business, 23.06.2019 20:00
The secret to effective sales is to have a unique selling proposition. good personality.
Answers: 1
Business, 23.06.2019 20:30
Suppose that the government establishes a price ceiling of $3.70 for wheat. a. why might the government establish this price ceiling?
Answers: 1
Explain why full employment may be inconsistent with no shirking. Shirking may be likely with full e...
Mathematics, 23.10.2020 15:40
English, 23.10.2020 15:40
Mathematics, 23.10.2020 15:40
Mathematics, 23.10.2020 15:40
Mathematics, 23.10.2020 15:40
Chemistry, 23.10.2020 15:40