Business, 18.06.2020 16:57 tonio638

Harry has two houses, a house on Quail Lake and a house in downtown Stockton. Sally wants to buy the house on the lake. Harry and Sally orally agree that Sally will buy the house on the lake for $500,000. Harry hurriedly writes out a contract providing that he would sell "his house" to Sally for $500,000. Harry signs the top of the document. Sally does not sign at all. No merger clause is included in the contract. Harry backs out of the contract, and Sally sues him. He tells the judge that the statute of frauds is not satisfied because he did not sign the document at the end and also because Sally did not sign at all. He also tells the judge that, at any rate, the agreement referred to the house in downtown Stockton, not the house on the lake; and that under the parol evidence rule, he had the right to identify the correct house. Which of the following is true regarding Harry's assertion that the statute of frauds is not satisfied because he did not sign the document at the end? A. Harry is incorrect because he is the one being sued, and he signed the document Harry is correct.
B. Harry is incorrect because the statute of frauds did not require Sally's signature so long as both the selling price and the type of subject matter involved was referenced.
C. Harry is incorrect because the statute of frauds did not require her Signature so long as the type of subject matter involved was referenced

Answers: 3

Show answers

Another question on Business

Business, 22.06.2019 02:00

Jamie lee is reviewing her finances one month later. she has provided the actual amounts paid below. use the cash budget table below to her identify the variances in her budget. each answer must have a value for the assignment to be complete. enter "0" for any unused categories. actual amounts income: monthly expenses: gross monthly salary $2,315 rent obligation $260 net monthly salary $1,740 utilities/electricity $130 savings allocation: utilities/water $10 regular savings $130 utilities/cable tv $155 rainy-day savings $20 food $160 entertainment: gas/maintenance $205 cake decorating class $90 credit card payment $25 movies with friends $50 car insurance $75 clothing $145 budgeted amounts assets: monthly expenses: checking account $1,850 rent obligation $225 emergency fund savings account $4,300 utilities/electricity $75 car $5,200 utilities/water $35 computer & ipad $1,100 utilities/cable tv $120 liabilities: food $115 student loan $6,600 gas/maintenance $95 credit card balance $1,000 credit card payment $45 income: car insurance $45 gross monthly salary $2,155 clothing $45 net monthly salary $1,580 entertainment: savings allocation: cake decorating class $90 regular savings $130 movies with friends $50 rainy day savings $20

Answers: 2

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 07:50

In december of 2004, the company you own entered into a 20-year contract with a grain supplier for daily deliveries of grain to its hot dog bun manufacturing facility. the contract called for "10,000 pounds of grain" to be delivered to the facility at the price of $100,000 per day. until february 2017, the supplier provided processed grain which could easily be used in your manufacturing process. however, no longer wanting to absorb the cost of having the grain processed, the supplier began delivering whole grain. the supplier is arguing that the contract does not specify the type of grain that would be supplied and that it has not breached the contract. your company is arguing that the supplier has an onsite processing plant and processed grain was implicit to the terms of the contract. over the remaining term of the contract, reshipping and having the grain processed would cost your company approximately $10,000,000, opposed to a cost of around $1,000,000 to the supplier. after speaking with in-house counsel, it was estimated that litigation would cost the company several million dollars and last for years. weighing the costs of litigation, along with possible ambiguity in the contract, what are three options you could take to resolve the dispute? which would be the best option for your business and why?

Answers: 2

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 10:10

conquest, inc. produces a special kind of light-weight, recreational vehicle that has a unique design. it allows the company to follow a cost-plus pricing strategy. it has $9,000,000 of average assets, and the desired profit is a 10% return on assets. assume all products produced are sold. additional data are as follows: sales volume 1000 units per year; variable costs $1000 per unit; fixed costs $4,000,000 per year; using the cost-plus pricing approach, what should be the sales price per unit?

Answers: 2

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 10:40

What would happen to the equilibrium price and quantity of lattés if the cost to produce steamed milk

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

Harry has two houses, a house on Quail Lake and a house in downtown Stockton. Sally wants to buy the...

Questions