Nick and Sheila Preston are married and have purchased a comprehensive major medical policy which covers them and their two sons, Wally and Brent. The policy has a: $500 calendar year family deductible,
a $2,500 stop-loss provision, and an
80% co-insurance clause.
The following losses occur:
A. On January 1, 2013, Sheila was treated for an infection at a cost of $200,
B. On July 1, 2013, Wally was treated for an injury suffered while waterskiing at a cost of $10,000
C. On December 5, 2013, Nick underwent eye surgery at a cost of $1,500, and
D. On January 5, 2014, Brent was treated for a broken leg at a cost of $2,000.
How much will the insurer pay for each of these losses?

Cooper sues company a in state court in south carolina, where he lives, for negligence alleging personal injury and property damage of $100,000 after a truck driven by an employee of company a rear-ended his pickup truck. company a is incorporated in delaware, has its headquarters in new york, but does a substantial amount of business in south carolina. claiming diversity of citizenship, company a seeks removal to federal district court, but cooper opposes the motion. which of the following is true regarding whether the case may be properly removed to federal district court? the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and if company a's nerve center is in a state other than south carolina, then the case may be properly removed to federal court.the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and because company a is incorporated and has its headquarters in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is incorporated in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a's headquarters, nerve center, or principal place of business is located.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is headquartered in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a is incorporated and regardless of the location of its nerve center.because the amount in controversy fails to satisfy jurisdictional requirements, regardless of the location of company a, the case may not be removed to federal court.