subject
Business, 14.07.2020 20:01 videogamers1214

On October 31, 2021, the bank statement for the checking account of Blockwood Video shows a balance of $12,660, while the company’s records show a balance of $12,306. Information that might be useful in preparing a bank reconciliation is as follows: Outstanding checks are $1,205. The October 31 cash receipts of $760 are not deposited in the bank until November 2. One check written in payment of utilities for $132 is correctly recorded by the bank but is recorded by Blockwood as a disbursement of $213. In accordance with prior authorization, the bank withdraws $645 directly from the checking account as payment on a note payable. The interest portion of that payment is $45 and the principal portion is $600. Blockwood has not recorded the direct withdrawal. Bank service fees of $19 are listed on the bank statement. A deposit of $562 is recorded by the bank on October 13, but it did not belong to Blockwood. The deposit should have been made to the checking account of Hollybuster Video, a separate company. The bank statement includes a charge of $70 for an NSF check. The check is returned with the bank statement, and the company will seek payment from the customer. 2. Record the necessary cash adjustments. (If no entry is required for a transaction/event, select "No Journal Entry Required" in the first account field.)

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Business

question
Business, 22.06.2019 14:00
The following costs were incurred in may: direct materials $ 44,800 direct labor $ 29,000 manufacturing overhead $ 29,300 selling expenses $ 26,800 administrative expenses $ 37,100 conversion costs during the month totaled:
Answers: 2
question
Business, 22.06.2019 17:00
Cooper sues company a in state court in south carolina, where he lives, for negligence alleging personal injury and property damage of $100,000 after a truck driven by an employee of company a rear-ended his pickup truck. company a is incorporated in delaware, has its headquarters in new york, but does a substantial amount of business in south carolina. claiming diversity of citizenship, company a seeks removal to federal district court, but cooper opposes the motion. which of the following is true regarding whether the case may be properly removed to federal district court? the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and if company a's nerve center is in a state other than south carolina, then the case may be properly removed to federal court.the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and because company a is incorporated and has its headquarters in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is incorporated in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a's headquarters, nerve center, or principal place of business is located.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is headquartered in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a is incorporated and regardless of the location of its nerve center.because the amount in controversy fails to satisfy jurisdictional requirements, regardless of the location of company a, the case may not be removed to federal court.
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 20:30
Afirm wants to hire a project manager (pm) at a salary of $100,000. 30% of pms have high ability, and 70% of pms have low ability. high ability pms generate $120,000 in revenue and low ability pms generate $80,000 in revenue. in addition to differences in productivity, high and low ability pms have different outside offers. if a high ability pm is not hired by the firm, she can work for another company at a salary of $80,000. if the low ability pm is not hired by the firm, she can work for another company for $70,000. high ability pms are also able to get a project management professional (pmp) certification at a cost of $1,000. low ability pms are unable to get a pmp certification (they would fail the test). the firm is not able to observe a pm’s ability, but is able to observe and verify whether or not the pm has a pmp certificate.(a) draw the extensive form of the game.expert answer
Answers: 3
question
Business, 23.06.2019 00:00
Wo firms, a and b, each currently dump 50 tons of chemicals into the local river. the government has decided to reduce the pollution and from now on will require a pollution permit for each ton of pollution dumped into the river. it costs firm a $100 for each ton of pollution that it eliminates before it reaches the river, and it costs firm b $50 for each ton of pollution that it eliminates before it reaches the river. the government gives each firm 20 pollution permits. government officials are not sure whether to allow the firms to buy or sell the pollution permits to each other. what is the total cost of reducing pollution if firms are not allowed to buy and sell pollution permits from each other? what is the total cost of reducing pollution if the firms are allowed to buy and sell permits from each other? a. $3,000; $1,500 b. $4,500; $3,500 c. $4,500; $4,000 d. $4,500; $2,500
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
On October 31, 2021, the bank statement for the checking account of Blockwood Video shows a balance...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 15.01.2021 17:50
question
Engineering, 15.01.2021 17:50
Questions on the website: 13722367