A homeowner from State A hired a contractor from State B to build a vacation home for her in State C. The parties signed the contract in State A. The contractor breached the contract, and the homeowner sued the contractor in a court of State A, seeking damages of $100,000. The contractor removed the case to the federal court for State A. The homeowner promptly moved to remand the case to state court, arguing that venue was improper. Which of the following facts is most relevant to the court's decision on the homeowner's motion?

A The contract was signed in State A.

B The contractor resides in State B.

C The homeowner commenced the action in a State A court.

D The vacation home was to be built in State C.

The Home owner commenced the action in a state A court ( C )

Explanation:

The Defendant ( the contractor)  can decide to transfer the case from a state court to a federal court within the same state in which the case was filled by the The home owner  if the federal court has the Jurisdiction to rule on the case

Since the contract was signed in state A under the laws of the state the case is definitely a state case and the Homeowner's move to remand the case to a state court with the argument that the Federal court lacks proper Jurisdiction is in order. The court decision on the matter will be based on the fact that the Homeowner commenced the action in a state A court where the contract was signed.

answerthe above statement is false;