Greg was looking at different websites to complete his paper for his accounting class. He found several websites that ended in .org, .gov, and .edu. He was unsure about franksmith. net, created by Frank Smith, which gave him a lot of information that he thought was important. Which best describes how Greg could find more information about the website to check for its validation?

In this question the options are missing; here are the options:

Which best describes how Greg could find more information about the website to check for its  validation?

Greg could assume it is valid because it is a .net.

Greg could look at the contact page to validate Frank's expertise.

Greg could look to see if the website was updated recently,

Greg could assume it is valid since Frank is not selling anything.

The answer to this question is B. Greg could look at the contact page to validate Frank's expertise.

Explanation:

One of the key factors that make a source to be credible is the expertise of the author because if the author is an expert in the area, the source is generally considered as credible. For example, the words of Isaac Newton are a credible source if these are related to areas such as maths, physics, or astronomy because he was an expert in this area. In this context, one way Greg could validate this source is by checking who is Frank Smith to verify if he is an expert in the topic. This makes option B correct.

answer; /// the above statement is (false);