If you were an advisor at a global summit on alternative energy, which source of energy would you recommend countries invest more money in

If I were an advisor at the alternative energy summit I would support investing in solar energy.

Explanation:

The reasons are various:

- The cost of implementation is much cheaper than that of wind turbines or hydrogenerators, which is why it is more economically profitable.

- It can be implemented in any area of the world or in any place where you find sunlight (such as areas of the Middle East), regardless of the hours of daily sunlight (The sun is an inexhaustible source of energy).

- It is a clean energy, since it produces energy without expense or damage to nature.

- In addition to this, the useful life of photovoltaic panels is 20 years, a fairly long time with respect to the amount of energy generated.

the correct answer is - no.

winnipeg, canada, is not further away from the equator than moscow, russia, in fact moscow is the city that is further away from the equator. moscow is on a latitude of 55.7558° north, while winnipeg is on a latitude of 49.8951° north, thus putting moscow by 5.8607° further away from the equator than winnipeg is.