A Japanese company builds an auto plant in Tennessee for $100,000,000, using only local labor and materials. The auto plant is a capital good produced by Americans and purchased by the Japanese. Using the expenditure approach, this transaction would be recorded as A. a $100,000,000 increase in investment. B. $100,000,000 paid to domestic factors of production. C. no change in GDP since the production of the plant is a transfer to the Japanese owners. D. a $100,000,000 increase in net exports. E. a $100,000,000 increase in production of capital goods. According to the income approach, this transaction would be recorded as A. $100,000,000 paid to domestic factors of production. B. a $100,000,000 increase in net exports. C. a $100,000,000 increase in production of capital goods. D. a $100,000,000 increase in investment. E. no change in GDP since the production of the plant is a transfer to the Japanese owners. According to the product approach, this transaction would be recorded as A. a $100,000,000 increase in net exports. B. a $100,000,000 increase in production of capital goods. C. a $100,000,000 increase in investment. D. $100,000,000 paid to domestic factors of production. E. no change in GDP since the production of the plant is a transfer to the Japanese owners.

Allie and sarah decided that they want to purchase renters insurance for the apartment they share. they made a list of all of the items to be covered by the insurance policy, along with their estimated values. if the items to be covered total more than $3000, the insurance company charges an annual premium of 23% of the total value of the items. if the items to be covered total $3000 or less, the insurance company charges an annual premium of 20% of the total value of the items.

In december of 2004, the company you own entered into a 20-year contract with a grain supplier for daily deliveries of grain to its hot dog bun manufacturing facility. the contract called for "10,000 pounds of grain" to be delivered to the facility at the price of $100,000 per day. until february 2017, the supplier provided processed grain which could easily be used in your manufacturing process. however, no longer wanting to absorb the cost of having the grain processed, the supplier began delivering whole grain. the supplier is arguing that the contract does not specify the type of grain that would be supplied and that it has not breached the contract. your company is arguing that the supplier has an onsite processing plant and processed grain was implicit to the terms of the contract. over the remaining term of the contract, reshipping and having the grain processed would cost your company approximately $10,000,000, opposed to a cost of around $1,000,000 to the supplier. after speaking with in-house counsel, it was estimated that litigation would cost the company several million dollars and last for years. weighing the costs of litigation, along with possible ambiguity in the contract, what are three options you could take to resolve the dispute? which would be the best option for your business and why?

On june 1, 2017, blossom company was started with an initial investment in the company of $22,360 cash. here are the assets, liabilities, and common stock of the company at june 30, 2017, and the revenues and expenses for the month of june, its first month of operations: cash $4,960 notes payable $12,720 accounts receivable 4,340 accounts payable 840 service revenue 7,860 supplies expense 1,100 supplies 2,300 maintenance and repairs expense 700 advertising expense 400 utilities expense 200 equipment 26,360 salaries and wages expense 1,760 common stock 22,360 in june, the company issued no additional stock but paid dividends of $1,660. prepare an income statement for the month of june.