If uncollectible accounts are determined by the aging-of-receivables method to be $ 1 comma 200, the uncollectible-account expense for 2018 would be $ 500. The balance of the Allowance account after the adjusting entry at year-end 2018 would be $ 1 comma 200. Using the aging-of-receivables method, the net realizable value of accounts receivable on the December 31, 2018, balance sheet would be.

some information is missing, so I looked for similar questions and found the attached image:

if uncollectible accounts are determined by the aging-of-receivables method to be $ 1 comma 200, the uncollectible-account expense for 2018 would be

The balance of the Allowance account after the adjusting entry at year-end 2018 would be

the adjusting journal entry should be:

Dr Bad debt expense 400

    Cr Allowance for uncollectible accounts 400

Using the aging-of-receivables method, the net realizable value of accounts receivable on the December 31, 2018, balance sheet would be

i think it is sales-oriented, but i am not sure

explanation: doctrine of respondeat superior is a legal doctrine that is commonly used in tort. this principle makes an employer or principal legally responsible for the wrongful acts done by an employee or agent, if such acts occur within the scope of the employment or agency.