Hey are there any country guys 14 or 15 that wanna talk?

In december of 2004, the company you own entered into a 20-year contract with a grain supplier for daily deliveries of grain to its hot dog bun manufacturing facility. the contract called for "10,000 pounds of grain" to be delivered to the facility at the price of $100,000 per day. until february 2017, the supplier provided processed grain which could easily be used in your manufacturing process. however, no longer wanting to absorb the cost of having the grain processed, the supplier began delivering whole grain. the supplier is arguing that the contract does not specify the type of grain that would be supplied and that it has not breached the contract. your company is arguing that the supplier has an onsite processing plant and processed grain was implicit to the terms of the contract. over the remaining term of the contract, reshipping and having the grain processed would cost your company approximately $10,000,000, opposed to a cost of around $1,000,000 to the supplier. after speaking with in-house counsel, it was estimated that litigation would cost the company several million dollars and last for years. weighing the costs of litigation, along with possible ambiguity in the contract, what are three options you could take to resolve the dispute? which would be the best option for your business and why?

Legal requirements, suppliers and distributors, competitors, and market profiles are contained in the element of your business plan. a. introduction b. operating plant c. industry d. business information

Rose bought a mattress for her guest bedroom for $100, on sale. the mattress is nonreturnable. although everyone who has slept on the mattress said it was very uncomfortable, rose will not get rid of it because she spent $100 on it. what psychological factor associated with behavioral economics explains rose's behavior?