Metal Fiber Industries, a fiber optic company is considering to optimize its capital structure. Its targeted capital structure consists of 20% debt, 30% preferred stocks, and 50% common stocks.
Metal Fiber Industries has been paying dividend 30% of its net income regularly. Current stock price is Rs. 54, and a constant growth rate is 9%. Metal fiber Industries expecting next year earning to be Rs. 44, 000,000. Last year dividend paid Rs. 3.60 by the company. Corporate tax rate is 40%.
Metal Fiber Industries considering to raise further debt at the interest rate of 12%. They are also considering to issue new preferred stock at 11% fixed dividend rate, which could be sold in the market at Rs. 110.

Cooper sues company a in state court in south carolina, where he lives, for negligence alleging personal injury and property damage of $100,000 after a truck driven by an employee of company a rear-ended his pickup truck. company a is incorporated in delaware, has its headquarters in new york, but does a substantial amount of business in south carolina. claiming diversity of citizenship, company a seeks removal to federal district court, but cooper opposes the motion. which of the following is true regarding whether the case may be properly removed to federal district court? the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and if company a's nerve center is in a state other than south carolina, then the case may be properly removed to federal court.the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and because company a is incorporated and has its headquarters in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is incorporated in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a's headquarters, nerve center, or principal place of business is located.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is headquartered in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a is incorporated and regardless of the location of its nerve center.because the amount in controversy fails to satisfy jurisdictional requirements, regardless of the location of company a, the case may not be removed to federal court.