Karen owns a designer clothing store in a small town. Since her store is the only store that offers designer outfits, she charges high prices for them. In the same town, another store deals in similar apparels but offers them at cheaper rates. Karen wants to maintain the exclusivity of her store. She is planning to slash prices. This move may incur losses. However, she is determined to give a tough competition to her competing store and ensure that it goes out of business.

Which of the following is likely not a benefit of requiring a grand jury to listen to and examine all of the evidence against a person suspected of committing a serious crime and then independently deciding whether or not to hand down an indictment? 1.the grand jury system provides the accused another safeguard against being sent to trial and facing conviction based on flawed evidence. 2.the members of the grand jury are drawn from the community and are empowered to render independent decisions about whether or not the government has collected enough evidence to bring an individual to trial. 3.the grand jury’s decision can provide prosecutors insight into what is necessary to build a sufficient case if a similar crime is presented later. 4.the grand jury is impaneled to rubber-stamp prosecutors’ cases, which makes it possible for more cases to reach trial.