subject
Business, 12.03.2021 15:10 leothedrifter

Nora Hudson, is the owner of a company that manufactures unique toys. She has come up with an idea for a new toy, and had her designer draw out the plans for that toy. Ms. Hudson has contacted Tim Wood, whose business it is to build prototypes/samples. Ms. Wood and Mr. Hudson are meeting, and after some preliminary greeting, she shows him the plans for the toy, and asks if he could make a sample of that toy so she could look at it and decide whether she wants to produce it. Tim took the plans drawn by Nora’s designer and said that he would get back to her. She said "ok", and the two parted. A few days later Tim called Laura and said that he could make the model if she wanted him to do it. Nora told him to go ahead and make the model. Two weeks later Tim called and told Nora that the model was ready for her to pick up and that the cost would be $5,000. She has now refused to purchase the model. She claims that there is no enforceable agreement between the two, or if there is, he took too long to make it and the price is too high. Analyze whether there is an agreement between the two. You must address every applicable Article 2 rule that applies.

Assume there is an agreement between them is her argument that it took too long and the price is too high valid? Why or why not? You must do a complete analysis of these two issues.

Bedn manufactures electrical wire, and ASC manufactures automobile sensors. Since 2010, ASC, in repeated transactions has purchased wire from Bedn to use in its sensors. On October 17, 2019, ASC sent Bedn a purchase order containing the quantity, price shipment date and product specifications. Bedn responded on October 22, 2019, with its order acknowledgment form. Bedn's order acknowledgment referenced ASC's specific request and contained boilerplate language on the back. The language on Bedn's form purports to limit Bedn's liability for special, indirect, and consequential damages. The back of the order acknowledgment also stated:

Where this agreement is found to be an acknowledgment, if such acknowledgment constitutes an acceptance of an offer such acceptance is expressly made conditional upon Buyer's assent solely to the terms of such acknowledgment, and acceptance of any part of product(s) delivered by company shall be deemed to constitute assent. Is there a contract, and if so what are the terms?

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Business

question
Business, 22.06.2019 07:10
9. tax types: taxes are classified based on whether they are applied directly to income, called direct taxes, or to some other measurable performance characteristic of the firm, called indirect taxes. identify each of the following as a “direct tax,” an “indirect tax,” or something else: a. corporate income tax paid by a japanese subsidiary on its operating income b. royalties paid to saudi arabia for oil extracted and shipped to world markets c. interest received by a u.s. parent on bank deposits held in london d. interest received by a u.s. parent on a loan to a subsidiary in mexico e. principal repayment received by u.s. parent from belgium on a loan to a wholly owned subsidiary in belgium f. excise tax paid on cigarettes manufactured and sold within the united states g. property taxes paid on the corporate headquarters building in seattle h. a direct contribution to the international committee of the red cross for refugee relief i. deferred income tax, shown as a deduction on the u.s. parent’s consolidated income tax j. withholding taxes withheld by germany on dividends paid to a united kingdom parent corporation
Answers: 2
question
Business, 22.06.2019 07:30
Which two of the following are benefits of consumer programs
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 12:50
Jallouk corporation has two different bonds currently outstanding. bond m has a face value of $50,000 and matures in 20 years. the bond makes no payments for the first six years, then pays $2,100 every six months over the subsequent eight years, and finally pays $2,400 every six months over the last six years. bond n also has a face value of $50,000 and a maturity of 20 years; it makes no coupon payments over the life of the bond. the required return on both these bonds is 10 percent compounded semiannually. what is the current price of bond m and bond n?
Answers: 3
question
Business, 22.06.2019 21:20
Which of the following best explains why large companies pay less for goods from wholesalers? a. large companies are able to pay for the goods they purchase in cash. b. large companies are able to increase the efficiency of wholesale production. c. large companies can buy all or most of a wholesaler's stock. d. large companies have better-paid employees who are better negotiators.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Nora Hudson, is the owner of a company that manufactures unique toys. She has come up with an idea f...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 27.10.2021 23:40
question
Mathematics, 27.10.2021 23:40
question
Mathematics, 27.10.2021 23:40
Questions on the website: 13722363