subject
Business, 03.04.2021 03:00 3000517

An attorney was employed by the United States Department of Health and Human Services in a regional office located in a tobacco-growing state. A labor contract between the agency and the clerical workers union contained a policy providing for termination of union employees only for certain specified grounds. The attorney, however, was not a member of the union and not covered by such a policy. The attorney was angered by the regional director's refusal to adopt a no-smoking policy for employees and visitors in the office. She posted a notice in the employee cafeteria ridiculing what she called the hypocrisy of an agency promoting health issues and nonsmoking programs while refusing to provide its employees with those same opportunities. The notice prompted a great deal of debate among the employees and was brought to the attention of the regional director, who was very displeased. Which of the following statements is most accurate regarding the director's right to dismiss the attorney?
A The attorney has a liberty interest in the exercise of her First Amendment rights that entitles her to a hearing to contest the grounds of her dismissal.
B The attorney has a property interest as a public employee that precludes her from being fired without notice and an opportunity to respond.
C The attorney has no right to a hearing because her statements were not an expression of views on public issues.
D The attorney has both a liberty interest and a property interest that entitles her to a pre-termination evidentiary hearing.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Business

question
Business, 21.06.2019 14:00
Forty-two percent of federal revenue comes from . income taxes paid by businesses and corporations make up about of federal revenue. taxes collected for social security and medicare make up of federal revenue.
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 17:00
Explain how can you avoid conflict by adjusting
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 19:00
Which of the following is likely not a benefit of requiring a grand jury to listen to and examine all of the evidence against a person suspected of committing a serious crime and then independently deciding whether or not to hand down an indictment? 1.the grand jury system provides the accused another safeguard against being sent to trial and facing conviction based on flawed evidence. 2.the members of the grand jury are drawn from the community and are empowered to render independent decisions about whether or not the government has collected enough evidence to bring an individual to trial. 3.the grand jury’s decision can provide prosecutors insight into what is necessary to build a sufficient case if a similar crime is presented later. 4.the grand jury is impaneled to rubber-stamp prosecutors’ cases, which makes it possible for more cases to reach trial.
Answers: 2
question
Business, 22.06.2019 20:00
Lillypad toys is a manufacturer of educational toys for children. six months ago, the company's research and development division came up with an idea for a unique touchscreen device that can be used to introduce children to a number of foreign languages. three months ago, the company produced a working prototype, and last month the company successfully launched its new device on the commercial market. what should lillypad's managers prepare for next? a. increased competition from imitators b. a prolonged period of uncontested success c. a sharp decline in demand for the product d. a difficult struggle to move from invention to innovation
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
An attorney was employed by the United States Department of Health and Human Services in a regional...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 06.03.2021 21:50
question
English, 06.03.2021 22:00
question
Spanish, 06.03.2021 22:00
question
Chemistry, 06.03.2021 22:00
Questions on the website: 13722367